Issue Brief: OOP Costs Among Medicare Part D Enrollees Reaching the Catastrophic Threshold

 

Issue Brief: OOP Costs Among Medicare Part D Enrollees Reaching the Catastrophic Threshold

  • This page as PDF

Summary

As policymakers consider reforms to the Part D benefit to address rising out-of-pocket (OOP) costs by adding a maximum OOP cap, an Avalere analysis examines the types of beneficiaries mostly likely to be helped by such a policy.
Please note: This is an archived post. Some of the information and data discussed in this article may be out of date. It is preserved here for historical reference but should not be used as the basis for business decisions. Please see our main Insights section for more recent posts.

Avalere’s analysis focused on the nearly 800,000 beneficiaries who reached catastrophic in 2017 and were not eligible for the low-income subsidy (LIS) or enrolled in an employer-group waiver plan (EGWP).1 This group incurred an average of just over $4,000 in OOP costs in 2017.

Avaerage beneficiary out-of-pocket prior to reaching catastrophic

The analysis finds that non-LIS beneficiaries who reached the catastrophic phase early in the year faced higher average annual OOP expenditures due to ongoing cost sharing in the catastrophic. For example, non-LIS enrollees who reached the catastrophic in the first 3 months of the year averaged more than $6,600 in OOP costs in 2017. Among this group, beneficiaries who filled at least one script after reaching the catastrophic in the first 3 months of the year incurred more than $2,000 in OOP costs on average after reaching the catastrophic. The analysis also finds that many non-LIS beneficiaries with the highest OOP expenditures face substantial OOP costs that are concentrated in a short period of time ($1,000 or $2,500 per month)—often in the first few months of the year. While an annual OOP cap would substantially limit overall OOP costs for many beneficiaries who reach the catastrophic, a portion of these beneficiaries could continue to face affordability challenges due to high OOP costs that are concentrated in a short period of time. These individuals might benefit from additional policies that reduce their high monthly expenditures. Additional affordability reforms could, for example, spread OOP costs over additional months or limit OOP spending on a monthly or per-script basis.

To receive Avalere updates, connect with us.

Download the full brief.

Percent of non-LIS beneficiaries reaching catastrophic

Percent of non-LIKS beneficiaries reaching catastrophicNotes

  1. EGWPs are Part D plans offered by employers to their retirees that often have more generous benefits with lower cost-sharing requirements than standard Part D plans. LIS beneficiaries receive premium and cost-sharing assistance from the government and do not have any cost sharing in the catastrophic phase of the benefit. As such, Avalere’s analysis focuses on the nearly 800,000 non-LIS, non-EGWP beneficiaries who reached the catastrophic in 2017 and who would mostly likely benefit from an OOP cap.
Webinar | Valuing the Patient Perspective: Patient-Centered HTA Our expert panel addressed the challenge of integrating patient perspectives into value assessments, discussing implications for evidence strategy, health equity, caregiver involvement, and downstream impacts on care delivery.
Learn More
Watch the Replay

Services

From beginning to end, our team synergy
produces measurable results. Let's work together.

Sign up to receive more insights about Federal and State Policy
Please enter your email address to be notified when new Federal and State Policy insights are published.

Back To Top